RagingElephants.org Billboards Up In Austin, TX
October 19, 2011 – 7:57 pm | 65 Comments

“The Herd” has done it, again!
Memorial Dedication Last Sunday.
RE.org Billboards, Today!
On this past Sunday the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial was dedicated on the Mall in our nation’s capital.  Today, 3 of our 4 …

Read the full story »
Bloggers

International

National

Spiritual

Texas

Home » National, Texas

“MLK Was GOP” BILLBOARD IS UP IN S.C.!!

Submitted by on January 19, 2010 – 9:01 am21 Comments

MLK-Was-GOP-Billboard-Orangeburg-SC-Jan-2010

Just in time for his birthday and national holiday, our 2nd “Martin Luther King, Jr. Was A Republican” billboard has been erected in South Carolina.

Located on US 601 in Orangeburg, South Carolina, it’s smack dab in the middle of Rep. James Clyburn’s district – the Majority Whip of the House and member of the Congressional Black Caucus.  It’s in the neighborhood of Historically Black Universities South Carolina State and Claflin University.

Congratulations to you, the financial partners of RagingElephants.org, and our RagingVols, for pushing us across the goal line.  Question: Are there any other organizations that are staying more consistently on the attack against the liberal agenda?

A special thanks to Jimbo Pratt for his extraordinary effort on this project.  He has the capacity to assist RagingElephants.org with securing more billboards across the nation.

Question: Would you like to see billboards erected in your community?  Then please become a financial partner of RagingElephants.org!  Our offensive campaigns only happen with your consistent donations.

Please take a few minutes right now to make a contribution to the expansion of our billboard campaign.  Can you make a donation of $30 dollars or more?  As we always say, any donation amount, no matter the size, is welcomed with heartfelt gratitude.

Click on the “DONATE” button at the top of the page  to the work of RagingElephants.org:

SPECIAL MESSAGE TO SOUTH CAROLINA PATRIOTS

All of you in S.C., let’s build on this momentum.  If you’d like to be a part of our South Carolina team, please click on the “Volunteer” button at the top of the page, fill out and submit our volunteer information form.

21 Comments »

  • Steve says:

    He was no republican! And he was NOT for equality.
    Read WHY WE CAN’T WAIT by him.
    In a speech to his staff in 1966 he said “We are now making demands that will cost the nation something. You can’t talk about solving the economic problems of the negro without talking about billions of dollars…We are treading in difficult waters, because it really means that we are saying that something is wrong…with capitalism. There must be a better DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH and maybe America must move towards a democratic SOCIALISM.”

    He told his staff, “I can’t say this publicly, and if you say I said it I’m not gonna admit to it.”

    By early 1968 King was calling for “a Redistribution of economic power.”

    I know this because I read this book:

    http://www.amazon.com/Questions-About-American-History-Supposed/dp/0307346692/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1263651359&sr=8-1

    It suck to realize I’m pretty much alone in so many areas.

    As Paul Harvey would say, now you know the rest of the story.

  • Anthony Brooking says:

    I hate seeing this billboard every time I go to work. It plays black people like they are idiots driven on emotion and not facts.

  • Brother Dave says:

    I am not familiar with this claim (MLK as a Republican). I assume it must refer to once entrenched voting patterns of African-Americans for the party of Abe Lincoln? If so, you need to get THAT message out first, otherwise this one puts you at risk of some unwelcome backfire.

  • JP says:

    It may be misleading, but if it gets a few people to stop and think, maybe some good can come of it.

    He WAS a Republican, but we can blame LBJ for leading him astray. The Kennedy/Johnson administration was the begining of the Democrats recognizing the power that their social liberalism could wield through the black community. LBJ told MLK what he wanted to hear and the dems have been tickling the ears of the blacks ever since.

    Isn’t it amazing how quickly the blacks forgot that the dems were the ones fighing the civil rights acts put forth by the GOP all the way through 1960, and by 1964 the jackasses were the champions of the movement!

  • Reginald McCray says:

    Apostle Claver,

    Do you have any T-shirts available for sale with the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., billboard information?

    Several friends and I would like to purchase this kind of T-shirt to wear to work.

    Keep up the good work.

  • Jaye Rocchietti says:

    seems like the above comments are going back and forth. All I know is the Republicans voted in favor of Civil Rights while Dems didn’t. I don’t know what party MLK was a part of. But I do believe that he wanted what was right. For people to be seen for the color of their heart (character) and not the color of their skin.

  • pilotx says:

    Not true Jaye. The northern Dems and GOP voted for the civil rights act while southern Dems and GOP members did not. What you’re leaving out is that the Republicans used this vote to steer racist whites into the Peublican party. Google LBJ’s comments after he signed this landmark legislation, he basically said the Democrats would lose the south for a generation and he was right to a certain extent. The Democrats lost a generation of white southern voters. This is the biggest reason Black people are not Republicans, the GOP cynically used the CRA to gain southern white support at the expense of Black voters. Look up the “southern strategy” to get more information about this. If we are going to talk about these matters we need to be telling the truth and the truth is Dr. King was not a Republican. For more evidence of this call the King Research Center at Stanford University to learn more about this. There was also an interview with the man himself on WVON in Chicago in which he stated he was non-partisan so he could affect both parties. For Dr. King to be a Republican means he was a liar about his party affiliation. As his fraternity brother and huge fan I tend to believe he was not a liar but some are trying to use his image for cynical purposes. Sad.

  • mike says:

    Jaye you are partially correct but also incorrect. Those who voted for the CRA were northern Dems and Repubs while the elected representatives in the south from both parties did not vote for it. The sad fact is that the GOP used this vote to lure southern whites to the Republican party due to their opposition to this law. LBJ said that the Dems would lose the south for a generation because he signed this law, what do you think he meant by this? Also, for whom did Dr. King support in the 1964 presidential election? Why did southern whites leave the Democratic party en-mass after the 1964 CRA? If you answer these questions you will have a clue as to why most Black people in this country do not support the GOP. If you are going to study history you have to study all of it or you will be lost on the nuance. Do a bit of research and you’ll see why your statement is only partially correct. If this was a college course you’d get an incomplete.

  • Elaine says:

    With so much controversy, you must be on to something. I believe Raging Elephants is bringing all kinds of voices together. Knowledge of history is one of the keys to making informed decisions for the future. The problem here is who is writing the history you are reading? Each group has an agenda. Recently it has been widely publicized that our history books are being changed; things added, twisted, left out or misleading information. The key I believe is to research the writer of the information you are ingesting. If you feel the writer is a person on the same path you wish to follow and has written credible work previously, I would read it twice. Also I feel Raging Elephants stand for decency, family values, and a strong christian foundation. Some are trying to stamp this out of the U.S. We need to come together NOW while we are still free. I am fortunate to be a woman born in a country, that will let all of us say how we feel. No one will stone, imprison, or beat me here.

  • mike says:

    No one will stone, imprison or beat you here YET. If the conservatives have their way they would return us to “biblical” laws. Well, since we have a constitution which strictly forbids it it will never happen but many conservatives want it. If you read the bible there are instructions for us to stone a woman to death if she is not a virgin on her wedding day so for those who want to impose Christianity as a rule here what is the difference between that and Sharia law? We have a secular government here and that’s a good thing. You’re free to believe and worship any way you want and I’m free to not believe or not worship. Everyone is happy right?

  • Pat says:

    It is interesting to see the comments above but one thing MLK was for equality under the law (i.e. Constitution). I think many of you need to hear his niece Dr. Alveda King talk about his vision of the country which was not socialism or government doing for others but each of us helping others.

  • KIMBERLY says:

    Pat,
    You are completely right….
    Dr. Alveda King is an Angel and God bless her.
    Civil Rights under the Constitution is a really simple concept. For many years the Liberals in Washington have been trying to manipulate the People for years regarding Civil Rights….

  • [...] billboard on the south side of Houston.  They also erected one of these, the first of this year in South Carolina.  The article says: Located on US 601 in Orangeburg, South Carolina, it’s smack dab in the [...]

  • Robtracy says:

    Mike,
    Your analysis of Christianity’s adherence to strict biblical law is either seriously flawed or deliberately contrived. Christianity had its reformation. Islam has not. When was the last time you heard of someone in the US being tried and found guilty of adultery, legal aged intercourse, or consensual sodomy? I can not readily remember one. As for why Blacks vote Democrat, by your own account, both southern democrats and republicans did not vote for the CRA. So if that is the case, why would blacks automatically opt for the democratic party if they too had let them down? I generally do not understand why so many African-Americans appear lock step with a party that has promised them so much and delivered so little. Especially when you look and see how many of the democratic passed social welfare programs have disproportionately eroded the Black family structure.
    Take a look at how many African-Americans are currently under Tea Party or GOP support, there are more than a handful. Not that more wouldn’t be even better.

  • Krizz says:

    The Dems hold their power only by dividing groups of Americans. Black against white; rich against poor. Divide and conquer! That has and will always be their gameplan. You know when a party has to divide your country to win they are not for what’s best for the country!

    When there are now more people on food stamps right now than ever before, it’s NOT just because of the economy. No, not at all. Democrats second part of their game plan is to have as many people DEPENDANT on the government. If they keep you dependant, they keep power over you. They then get your vote because you now are a slave to the government.

    Ever notice what happens when any African American DARES to find out the truth and think for himself or herself and finds out the real truth about the Democtats? They are called Uncle Tom, etc., etc. by Democrat leaders. If we step off the Democrat dependant plantation, well, you get slapped down for not going along with their program of lies, dependence and just existing.

    Raging Elephants is doing good, speaking truth. Maybe people will finally wake up and see Republicans are really the party that wants the best for us!

  • Mateo says:

    Dr King was a Republican as was his father and grandfather. Only three Republicans voted against the CRA in 1964 filibustered by the infamous Robert Byrd (D) WV.

    JFK was able to get credit for getting MLK out of prison which resulted in him winning over 60% of the African American vote (even though it was RFK who would wiretap Dr King on suspition of acts of terrorism.

    The GOP began as the first anti abolition party in 1853 in Battle Creek MI. Their first elected President, Abraham Lincoln, along with majorities in Congress emancipated blacks. The South remained dominiated by white Democrats until the 1990s.

  • Michael W Buckley says:

    Is this some lame joke or an attempt to get rich quick?

    In the interests of honesty how about a billboard stating

    GOP is the anti-black

  • Tony says:

    Reagan was a democrat. So what. Does anyone here honestly think things are the same now? Its insulting to say MLK would have anything…ANYTHING to do with that party now. Beck, you make me sick.

  • Sable says:

    Why does it matter what political party one belongs too. This is so silly. Voting should only be about the issues, and we should vote using our intellect not our political association. I care not for Democrats or Republicans, we are all subject to same failings as those we criticize, no one person has the answer, but our lives are as different as the snowflakes that fall during winter. Dr. King being a Republican means what nothing, anyone who to becomes a Republican base on that, is not much an independent thinker.
    I don’t attend church out of shame and I don’t join political parties because some famous African-American belong to any one of them, The human mind does three things, think, feel and want, and we should use our minds more than we use our race to get points across concerning certain issue. So if it makes you feel good to use Civil Right leaders to get more blacks to become Republican, good for you, it’s insulting to their intelligence.
    No, not even in High School did I give into the click thing. The money spent on the billboards could have went to a better cause.

  • NotWaiting4Godot says:

    More and more people are beginning to discern the playing out of this revealing leftist dictum:

    “The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.”

    “In other words the cause – whether inner city blacks, women, gay rights, [immigration, or Fox News] – is never the real cause, but only an occasion to advance the real cause which is the accumulation of power to make the revolution.”

    Refer to David Horowitz’s pamphlet: “Barack Obama’s Rules For Revolution – The Alinsky Model”

    Revolutionary’s aren’t compassionate populists. They are exploiters for their cause. Wake up rank-and-file Democrats, you may be all about the “causes”, but powerful forces in the party are all about the “revolution.” Once the “revolution” is secured, your causes will become just another threat to power. If they succeed, they will come for you.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.